Market Brief · 9 Sep 2026
New Zealand · Mortgage Lead Generation

The channel has already won. This is a share fight.

State of play for a life insurance and KiwiSaver firm launching a mortgage brokerage — where advisers actually get leads, what is working digitally right now, and what the numbers will carry.

Prepared 9 Sep 2026 Ad data current to 7 Sep 2026 Sources Ahrefs · Meta Ad Library · RBNZ · FMA

The one-paragraph version

Advisers now write ~60% of all new NZ home lending — so this is a share fight, not a category fight. The economics are unusually forgiving: 0.85–0.90% upfront on settlement means a $600k loan pays roughly $5,100–$5,400, which tolerates a cost-per-settled-mortgage most verticals could never carry. But bottom-of-funnel search volume in NZ is tiny — "mortgage broker" is 1,800 searches a month nationally, "mortgage adviser" is 150 — so Google is a floor, not a plan. The volume channel is Meta at roughly NZ$55–75 a lead, and the SERP for the money terms is owned by the local pack, the MoneyHub/Opes listicles and Reddit, which a brand-new domain cannot displace. For a firm with an existing life and KiwiSaver book, the cheapest mortgages they will ever write are already sitting in their database — and that should fund the paid experiments, not the other way round.

Broker share of new lending
~60%
Westpac 58% of book · ANZ 53% · BNZ 40%
OCR
2.75%
Hiked 2 Sep 2026 — back-to-back. Full 25bps passed to floating
Upfront on a $600k loan
~$5,200
0.85–0.90% at settlement. Clawback bites at 24–27 months
"Mortgage adviser" searches
150/mo
Nationally. The entire BOF search market is a few thousand

01Market state of play

Two things changed recently that most advertisers in this market have not caught up with.

Rates have turned — this is the timing story

MeasurePosition
OCR2.75% — hiked 25bps on 2 September 2026, a back-to-back hike
FloatingANZ 6.29% · ASB 6.29% · BNZ 6.34% · Kiwibank 6.25% · Westpac 6.39%
1-year fixed~4.95% (Kiwibank)
DirectionRising. Banks passed the full 25bps to floating — unlike the 2025 cuts, which they under-passed

Why this matters commercially

Every mortgage ad in the country for the last 18 months has run some version of "rates are falling — refix and save." That hook is now dead or actively wrong. The market has flipped to "lock it in before it moves again" — urgency-led rather than saving-led. Whoever changes creative first gets a clean run while everyone else keeps running stale angles.

Structural demand drivers

Channel share — advisers have already won

BankBroker-originated share of bookTrend
Westpac58%Mar 2026, up from 56.7% Sep 2025
ANZ53%Mar 2026, up from 51% two years earlier
BNZ40%Mar 2026, up from 38% Sep 2024
Market — new home loans~60%Big four + Kiwibank take 86% of broker-sourced lending; non-banks 8%

The economics that make media buying viable

ItemFigure
Upfront commission0.55%–0.85% of loan — ANZ, ASB and TSB all pay 0.85%, no trail
Westpac from 1 Jun 2026Single 0.90% upfront, trail abolished
Trail (where paid)0.15%–0.20% p.a. on balance
ClawbackFull or partial if discharged inside 24–27 months

The number the whole model hangs off

A $600k average loan pays ~$5,100–$5,400 on settlement. That is what justifies paid acquisition here. It also means clawback is a marketing problem, not just an ops problem — a lead source that produces serial refinancers destroys the unit economics twice. Measure to settled and retained past 27 months, never to lead.

02Where advisers actually get leads

Ranked by real volume, honestly.

  1. Existing client book — refix, refinance, top-up, next purchase. The largest and cheapest source, and the one most firms under-work. Every loan has a known refix date; that is a calendar, not a campaign.
  2. Referral partners — real estate agents (the highest-value relationship in the market), then accountants, lawyers, builders and developers, and increasingly other advisers cross-referring.
  3. Aggregator / group brand — NZFSG (merged with Kepa: 1,600+ members, $17bn of mortgages settled and $30m of life premium a year), Loan Market, Kiwi Adviser Network, Astute, Finsure NZ, Link Financial Group, Mike Pero. Brand and lead flow come attached to the group.
  4. Affinity and community networks — the highest-converting cold source in NZ and consistently underrated. Ethnic-community Facebook groups, migrant cohorts, employer groups, church and sports clubs. Converts at multiples of paid because trust is pre-supplied. Does not scale, and gets crowded fast once others notice.
  5. Google Business Profile + reviews — the local pack sits above every organic result on the money terms.
  6. Third-party listicles and comparison sites — MoneyHub, Opes Partners, Canstar, Glimp, NZ Compare. These own the head terms. Getting listed is a distribution decision, not an SEO one.
  7. Reddit r/PersonalFinanceNZ — ranks #6 for "mortgage broker auckland" with two separate recommendation threads. Real referral traffic; cannot be bought, only earned.
  8. Bought leads — comparemortgagedeals.co.nz, The Growth Academy, Fly Me High and similar. Generally non-exclusive, quality highly variable. Useful as a stopgap to keep new advisers busy; corrosive as a strategy.
  9. Paid media — Google Search, Meta, and increasingly TikTok.

03What's working digitally — channel by channel

Google Ads — high intent, almost no volume

KeywordSearches/moCPC (USD)KD
mortgage calculator nz20,000$0.2054
mortgage broker1,800$4.5068
best mortgage rates nz900$0.7057
kiwisaver first home800$0.5045
mortgage broker auckland700$5.0053
home loan nz350$1.0062
refinance mortgage nz150$2.5048
mortgage adviser150$5.0036
mortgage advisor near me150$4.0034
first home buyer nz90$0.8055
mortgage pre approval nz30$3.50

Ahrefs CPC is a USD estimate (≈NZ$8.50 at $5.00). Real auction CPCs in NZ financial services routinely run well above this — treat as a floor, not a forecast.

The read

Total high-intent commercial volume across every meaningful mortgage term in New Zealand is a few thousand searches a month, nationally. Even at 100% impression share you cannot build a multi-adviser business on search alone. Note the shape too: the only high-volume term is mortgage calculator nz at 20,000/month on a 20c CPC — that is research traffic, not buyers, and it is exactly the trap of paying to fill an education funnel. Google's real job here is to catch demand you created elsewhere, plus a tight non-brand BOF core. It is a capture channel, not a demand channel.

Organic search — effectively closed to a new brand

SERP for "mortgage broker auckland":

PosResultNotes
1Local pack — Kiwi Mortgages, Global Finance, My MoneySits above all organic
2People Also Ask block
3nzhl.co.nzDR 42
4MoneyHub listicleDR 65
5Opes Partners "Top 10 Brokers"DR 58 · 180 backlinks
6Reddit ×2 recommendation threadsr/PersonalFinanceNZ
7SquirrelDR 49 · 870 backlinks
8Guardian SmithDR 14
9Loan Market CentralDR 56

A brand-new domain ranks nowhere against this inside 12 months. At $500/month you buy spammy backlinks and nothing else; real movement in this vertical starts around $3–4k/month. But two doors are open and cheap: the local pack (a Google Business Profile per adviser and location, driven by review velocity) and placement on the listicles that already rank. Both are distribution plays, not ranking plays.

Meta — the volume channel

Benchmarks: financial services median CPL ~US$38 (≈NZ$64), with finance CPLs up 24% year on year.

What is actually live in New Zealand right now. These counts come from the verified niche view — an earlier draft used the raw view, which is known to misclassify ~57% of advertisers and inflates counts through a join fan-out. Verified NZ Lending & Finance is 740 ads across 18 advertisers, not the 4,618/38 the raw view reports:

AdvertiserLive adsLongest runWhat they're doing
Platinum Finance121217d7-step multi-step form, "Apply in 3 minutes", 5.0★ / 314 Google reviews above the fold, "won't affect your credit score" objection-killer in the subhead, income pre-qualifier on step 1
BetterSaver (KiwiSaver)11973dQuiz funnel, "free — paid by the provider", licensed FAP number shown, Stuff / NZ Herald / RNZ media logos. Running FB + Google + LinkedIn + Microsoft + Reddit + TikTok
Naked Finance22121dThe closest analogue here — FHB guide + UK pension transfer guide, dual CTA (download and book), 289 Google reviews, mortgages + KiwiSaver + insurance + investments under one adviser brand
Better (betterco.nz)3979dFB + Google + Microsoft + TikTok
Total Mortgages632dsave.total.nz/refinance, Vercel-hosted, Facebook only
Instant Finance, MTF, Harmoney, LoanDirect, Prospaup to 158dConsumer / business lending, not mortgage — but they set the CPM you compete against

The empirical pattern across every ad surviving 60+ days

On verified data, ads surviving 60+ days break down as: 117 ads (10 advertisers) top-of-funnel LEARN_MORE with no offer, averaging 130 days; 83 ads mid-funnel APPLY_NOW, averaging 107 days; 34 ads bottom-funnel APPLY_NOW. Lead-magnet offers total just 15 ads across the whole proven cohort.

Caveat added after seeding: that cohort was consumer lenders and insurers — it contained almost no mortgage brokers. Now that the brokers are in, the picture is more balanced: Squirrel's single longest-running ad (119 days) is a lead-magnet download, and it runs guides for first-home buyers, refixing and investing. So the honest read is not "lead magnets don't work" — it is that consumer lenders run apply-now and advisers run guides-plus-consult. See the messaging section below.

What the winners share: review counts above the fold, a named regulated entity, a credit-score or cost objection killed in the subhead, and a multi-step form with a qualifier on step one. Nobody wins on creative polish.

TikTok — real, and structurally suited to an adviser-led brand

Mortgage content averages ~3.7% engagement versus ~0.15% on Facebook. Unpolished, phone-shot, single-adviser-to-camera outperforms produced brand video by a wide margin. Skews first home buyer, 20s–30s. Already in use by NZ finance advertisers — BetterSaver, Better, Instant Finance and Platinum all show TikTok pixels.

This is where "use the advisers to build the brand" converts directly into media, because the asset the algorithm rewards is exactly the asset a stable of advisers can produce for free.

ChatGPT Ads — live in New Zealand now

The OpenAI pilot went live in New Zealand on 17 April 2026, and as of 3 September 2026 NZ is listed for self-service access through OpenAI Ads Manager (beta). Ads serve to Free and Go plan users only — Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu accounts do not see them. Buying is CPC or CPM, with reporting on impressions, clicks, spend, CTR, average CPC/CPM and conversions.

Targeting is conversational context and intent, not exact-match keywords. That matters for this category: the mortgage journey is a long series of questions people are already asking an assistant — "how much deposit do I actually need", "should I fix for one year or two", "can I use KiwiSaver for a first home" — and this is the first channel that lets you buy against that conversation directly.

Why it's worth a small line item now

It is a beta with almost no NZ financial-services competition in it. That is the cheap-attention window, and windows like this close. It does not replace Meta as the volume channel — but a contained test alongside the AI-visibility work (being the brand the assistants cite organically) is a genuinely differentiated position for a brand launching into a category where everyone else is still buying "book a consultation" clicks.

LinkedIn

Not a consumer channel here. Its job is referral-partner acquisition — real estate agents, accountants, lawyers — and adviser recruitment. Naked Finance runs it; BetterSaver runs it.

03bLive ads — I seeded the tracker, here's the real picture

An earlier version of this brief said the category was thin on Meta. That was an artefact of the watchlist, not the market. I've now added 25 NZ mortgage advertisers to the scraper and re-run it.

Correction

The ad database is a curated watchlist, not a mirror of the Ad Library — it simply had almost no mortgage brokers in it. Having seeded and scraped them, the tracked set is now 27 mortgage advertisers, 597 ads, 326 of them live. The category is not thin. Some of it has been running continuously for close to six years.

Mortgage advertisers now tracked
27
Seeded and scraped 9 Sep 2026
Ads captured
597
326 currently live
Longest continuous run
2,112d
Squirrel — advertising since Nov 2020
Most live ads right now
63
Lighthouse Financial

Who is actually advertising

AdvertiserAdsLiveLongest runSinceAd Library
NZHL251271,997dMar 2021View →
Squirrel69292,112dNov 2020View →
Lighthouse Financial67631,966dApr 2021View →
Journey Mortgages333362dJul 2026View →
Naked Finance2322121dApr 2026View →
Rayen & Wood Financial191998dJun 2026View →
Mike Pero Mortgages181822d17 Aug 2026View →
Key & Compass1818119dMay 2026View →
Buddy Mortgages & Insurance17161,253dApr 2023View →
Finance Lab NZ141457dJul 2026View →
Southern Mortgages NZ121228dAug 2026View →
Total Mortgages6632dMay 2026View →

Plus a long tail of individual advisers running 1–5 ads each: Simpler Mortgages, Mortgage Easy, Matt Willoughby, Brenda Nom, Paolo Valerio, Courtney Harrison (Aim Financial), Stuart Harris (The Finance Collective).

The finding that matters most for this meeting

Mike Pero launched a coordinated franchise-wide campaign on 17 August 2026 — all 18 brand-level ads started that exact day, and so did the individual adviser pages: Dan Parry, Rose & Tim Ross (Tauranga), David Clemens. Craig Chirnside (Dunedin) followed on 5 September.

NZHL runs the same shape: a corporate page advertising since March 2021, plus branch pages (Cambridge, Papamoa) running their own ads.

This is exactly the model being proposed for today — a brand plus a stable of advisers each carrying their own presence — and there is a live NZ implementation three weeks old to copy or beat. Individual adviser pages: Dan Parry · David Clemens · Rose & Tim Ross · NZHL Cambridge

Three operators worth studying

Four BetterSaver ads worth opening

Still the best-run funnel for their existing business — same customer, same regulatory frame, same "free advice" model. All four lead with a cost of inaction, not a product:

HookFormatWhy it's interestingLink
"Don't let the wrong fund cost you $120,000"VideoA single specific number doing all the work. No offer, no lead magnet.Open →
"Most Kiwis are in the wrong KiwiSaver"VideoCategory-level accusation, then a statOpen →
"Stop Googling. Start knowing."ImageNames the behaviour the prospect is doing right nowOpen →
"Later has a cost"CarouselProcrastination as the enemyOpen →

Ad Library links open Meta's public archive. Ads rotate, so a link may 404 if that creative has been retired.

03cMessaging, hooks and emotional register

Read directly from the live ad copy of the five most significant advertisers. The single most useful observation is what nobody does.

Not one of them leads with rates

Across every live ad from NZHL, Squirrel, Lighthouse, Journey and Mike Pero, no advertiser competes on "best rates". They sell time, freedom, found money, and expertise. In a market where the product is functionally identical between brokers, the whole category has already worked out that rate is not the wedge — and a new brand arriving with "we'll find you the best rate" would be the only one saying it, for the wrong reason.

NZHL — mortgage freedom, and a life while you do it

The strongest positioning in the market, and the most disciplined. Sells the outcome, never the transaction.

They renamed the job — "Mortgage Mentor", not broker or adviser

Every NZHL ad says talk to a Mortgage Mentor. This is the same move as the UK's "mortgage in principle" in section 04: take the undifferentiated thing everyone sells, give it a name you own, and make the category compete on your vocabulary. It is the cheapest competitive moat in the brief.

Squirrel — guides and found money

Lighthouse Financial — the closest analogue to today's prospect

63 live ads. An accounting + insurance + KiwiSaver firm running the exact multi-service cross-sell motion the prospect is proposing.

Journey Mortgages — new brand, education-led, all video

Launched July 2026 from nothing to 33 live ads. The closest thing to a live rehearsal of this launch.

Mike Pero — one hook, a matrix of segments

All 18 ads carry the identical headline "Get in the Know Today". The body is the only thing that changes, and it changes by audience:

SegmentBody copy
First home buyer"First Home Buyer? Let's Get You Started!"
Refixer"Time to Refix? We Know the Ropes ⏳"
Investor"Investor-Friendly Mortgage Advice 📊"
Self-employed"Flexible Mortgages for Self-Made Success 💼"
Local / trust"Local Experts, Personalised Service 🤝"
Authority"Your Mortgage, Our Legacy 🤝 Helping Kiwis into Homes for Over 35 Years"

This is a segment matrix — one creative concept, N audience variants — and it is the most directly copyable structure here for a brand launching with a stable of advisers and five ICPs.

Worth noting as a QA lesson rather than a strategy: two Mike Pero ads run simultaneously claiming "Over 30 Years" and "Over 35 Years". Under FMA fair-dealing, substantiated claims need to be consistent across a live set.

The emotional register, summarised

AdvertiserPrimary emotionProof deviceOffer
NZHLAspiration + humour — freedom, timeSubstantiated maths footnoteFree chat with a Mortgage Mentor
SquirrelReassurance + found moneyCashback figuresDownloadable guide, then book
LighthouseLoss aversion — what you're missingNamed client outcomesGuide + review consult
JourneyCuriosity — "most people don't realise"Named client storiesFree calculator
Mike PeroRecognition + authority35 years / local expertsSegment-matched consult

What has NOT run yet — be straight about this

The rule-based psychology tagger (hook type, psych triggers, offer type) is still processing the full table and was not finished at the time of writing. The LLM copy, vision and landing-page analysis has not been run on the 25 newly seeded advertisers — so there are no machine-scored copy_angle, copy_awareness, visual_style or landing-page teardown fields for them yet. Everything above is read directly from the live ad copy, not machine-scored. The deeper pass is a ~20-minute job whenever it's wanted.

03dThe build — Charley T / Becker applied to NZ mortgage

Designed against the Andromeda Field Manual already in the brain (20 sections, synthesised from 8 Charley T and 2 Alex Becker transcripts). Section references below are to that manual.

Budget is an output here, not a constraint

No budget has been stated for this business. The figure that actually governs the structure is not what someone wants to spend — it is Meta's learning threshold: ~50 optimisation events per ad set per 7 days. Everything below is derived from that.

The number that sets the floor

At a financial-services CPL of roughly NZ$64, 50 leads a week costs ~NZ$3,200/week ≈ NZ$460/day ≈ NZ$14k/month. That is the minimum for one ad set to reliably exit learning on a lead event. Below it, the structure is unstable no matter how it is drawn.

What you're fundingDailyMonthlyWhat it buys
One campaign, one ad set — learning-safe~NZ$460~NZ$14k~215 leads/mo. The minimum that works.
One campaign + a test ad set~NZ$700~NZ$21kAdds the 322 test loop — the thing that compounds creative quality
Two campaigns (refix + FHB), each learning-safe~NZ$950~NZ$29kBoth audiences funded properly, own page each
Terminal structure — control + 2 tests per profile$1,400+$42k+Charley's ceiling. Never grows past this structurally.

What that returns, and the sanity check

Modelled on the refix campaign at ~NZ$14–15k/month:

StepFigureBasis
Leads~235/moNZ$15k ÷ NZ$64 CPL
Qualified~150~35% self-disqualify at the form
Real conversations~90~60% show rate — refix buyers are already qualified, unlike cold FHB
Settlements~11/mo~12% of conversations
Commission~$57k/mo11 × ~$5,200 (0.85–0.90% on a $600k loan)
Cost per settled loan~$1,360$15k ÷ 11

Why that last number is the one to trust

~$1,360 per settled loan lands inside the UK first-party band of $1,200–$2,000 from section 04 — a market with 13× the population and years more maturity. The model was built from NZ CPLs and NZ commission, and it independently arrives where the mature market actually sits. That is the strongest reason to believe the shape is right.

It is also 4–7× cheaper than the $5,000–$15,000 aggregator band — which is the case against buying leads, in one number.

Two assumptions that must be validated in weeks 1–4, not assumed

1. CPL. NZ$64 is a global financial-services median. New Zealand is a thinner auction with a smaller supply pool — real NZ CPL could land meaningfully higher. Everything above scales off this one number.
2. Lead → settlement rate. The 12% is modelled on refix buyers being warmer than the cold-funnel assumptions used on the 2 September call. Plausible, unproven.

Neither is knowable before launch. That is the entire argument for phasing rather than launching everything at once.

Structure

LayerBuildWhy
CampaignOne, CBOAll spend feeds one learning system (§5, Structure A)
Ad sets1 control. Add 1 test only once the control reliably exits learningBudget ladder rung 1→2. Hard ceiling is 3 ad sets even at $1M/mo
Control adsThe 5 Olympic Rings below4–8 ads, mixed image and video
Test adOne 322: 3 creatives, 2 headlines, 2 primary texts12 combinations, one shared learning pool (§6). Never load 5–10 creatives
RetargetingBroad, inside the control — rings 4 and 5Not pixel-event. Chasing form-abandoners chases people who already said no
Landing pageOne, with continuity from the primary textA second page is only earned when a hook proves it deserves its own system

The five rings, with hooks for the NZ buying cycle

Ring 4 is the second touch for anyone who saw 1 or 2. Ring 5 is the second touch for 2 or 3. The overlap is the point — same message, rebuilt for someone who has already seen it.

RingJobHook direction for NZ mortgage
1 · Problem
cold
Name a gap they have not quantified. No product, no offer."The refix email is not an offer. It's a default."
Your fixed term ends, the bank emails you one number, you click accept. That is not a decision — and it is how most of the country refixes. Nobody ever looks at the structure underneath.
2 · Mechanism
cold
Your named, new process. This is where the "name the step" play from §04 lands."Rate is one line in a loan. Structure is the other nine."
Name the process and own it — the way NZHL owns "Mortgage Mentor" and the UK owns "mortgage in principle". Split banding, offset, term length, and a refix calendar — then taken to every lender, not just yours.
3 · Trigger
cold
The life event that makes it urgent right now. Identity-specific.Three live NZ triggers, one ad each if budget allows:
"Your 2023 fix is about to land in a 2026 market." (the refix wave)
"The deposit rule changed in December. Your bank didn't call you." (LVR: 25% of owner-occupier lending can now go above 80%)
"Rates went up twice. The next move isn't yours to wait for." (OCR 2.75%, back-to-back hikes)
4 · Proof
warm — 2nd touch for 1+2
A named client outcome. Answers "does this work for someone like me?""Same rate. Different structure. Nine years off the loan."
Named couple, suburb, what was actually changed, what it did. This is precisely what Journey ("Ben had received an inheritance…") and Lighthouse ("we helped Rachel & Dion…") already run — it is the proven proof device in this market.
5 · Objections
warm — 2nd touch for 2+3
Dismantle what they are doing instead."Your bank made you an offer. That isn't the same as advice."
Three objections to handle: the bank's retention offer (they are paid to keep you, not restructure you); the existing adviser (when did they last review the structure, not the rate?); and "I'll do it later" — which NZHL already attacks with "don't wait until your wrinkles have wrinkles".

Becker's six slots, mapped

Same object from the other direction — a sales script distributed across six ads (§8). Slots 1–3 are rings 1–3; slots 4–6 are rings 4–5.

SlotFormatNZ mortgage build
1UGC video — adviser to cameraThe refix-default problem. Run 3 hooks here to find which agitates most. This is where the adviser stable becomes the media asset.
2Static — winning hookOnce slot 1 names the winner, rebuild it as a static and build the rest of the funnel around it
3Same problem, second benefitLean on time (years off the loan) rather than rate — the whole category already avoids rate
4The offer, straight upThe named structure review. Free, no obligation, and say what happens in it
5Client resultNamed testimonial plus the actual mechanics of what was done
6Objection handlerBig-text static. The bank's offer, the current adviser, "later"

The signal layer — the part that decides whether this works

§15 of the manual: optimise for the outcome, not the event. In this vertical that is unusually hard and unusually important:

Three places this doctrine does not cover your situation

The field manual is explicit that these are gaps, so treat the application here as reasoning rather than doctrine:

Also worth knowing: nothing in the manual is independently verified (§19). Both men are selling — Charley promotes Disruptor Academy, Becker is CEO of Hyros. "Both agree" means strong consensus, not corroboration.

Refix vs first home buyer — do they get separate campaigns?

With budget available, the §5 splitting rule now scores 3 of 3: different problem ✓, different landing page ✓, enough budget for each to exit learning ✓. So yes — separate campaigns, Becker structure, one dedicated page each.

But the deciding factor is not the audience. It is the conversion window:

Refix / refinanceFirst home buyer
Cycle14–30 days3–18 months
Already qualified?Yes — the loan existsNo — the deposit may not exist
Pixel behaviourLearns fast, closes the loopNever closes inside the attribution window
Optimisation eventLead → settledMust use an intermediate event (pre-approval submitted)
Watch forClawback at 24–27 months — refinancers are the exposed segmentJudging it on the refix clock and killing it at day 60

Run them together in one ad set and Meta optimises toward whichever converts faster — refix — and starves FHB. Worse, optimising to "lead" lets the FHB half flood the funnel with leads that never settle, teaching the algorithm the wrong lead shape. They need separate campaigns, separate events, and separate clocks.

The phasing — and it still matters with money

  1. Weeks 1–6 — refix only, one campaign, learning-safe from day one (~NZ$14k/mo). Not because FHB is unaffordable, but because you cannot budget for FHB until refix has told you the true CPL and the true lead→settlement rate. Refix is the fastest, cleanest instrument for discovering both — short window, qualified buyers, dated mechanical trigger.
  2. Weeks 6–10 — add the 322 test ad set to refix (~NZ$21k/mo). Only once the control reliably exits learning. This is where creative quality starts compounding.
  3. Month 3 — launch FHB as its own campaign with its own page and its own optimisation event (~NZ$29k/mo total). By now real numbers exist, tracking is proven, and FHB gets judged on a 3–18 month clock instead of being killed at day 60.
  4. Month 4+ — graduate further ICPs (investor, self-employed, sell-and-buy) one at a time, each only when a hook has earned its own page, proof and objections.

The FHB shortcut nobody else has

Even with unlimited budget, buying cold first-home-buyer traffic is the second-best way for this business to get first home buyers. KiwiSaver first-home withdrawal is a mortgage-intent signal they already hold — someone drawing down is buying inside about 90 days, and no competitor can see it. Paying Meta for cold FHB while sitting on a KiwiSaver book is buying something you already own.

So: buy refix, harvest FHB — and let paid FHB be the top-up once the owned channel is exhausted, not the first move.

04The UK benchmark — what a mature market does differently

The UK runs the same product to the same kind of buyer, but the market is roughly 13× the population and vastly more developed. The gaps are where the ideas are.

TermUK vol/moUK CPCNearest NZ termNZ vol/moMultiple
mortgage in principle20,000$10.00mortgage pre approval nz30667×
mortgage advisor17,000$6.00mortgage adviser150113×
remortgage14,000$5.00refinance mortgage nz15093×
first time buyer mortgage6,900$1.00first home buyer nz9077×
mortgage broker13,000$6.00mortgage broker1,800
mortgage calculator380,000$0.70mortgage calculator nz20,00019×
buy to let mortgage29,000$0.80
how much can i borrow mortgage15,000$0.70
bad credit mortgage1,900$5.00

CPC is Ahrefs' USD estimate. Population multiple UK:NZ is roughly 13×, which makes the outliers above the real story.

The single best idea to steal — name the step

"Mortgage in principle" is a 20,000-a-month search term in the UK carrying the highest CPC in the entire set ($10.00). It is not a product. It is a named, searchable, mid-funnel step that the UK industry productised, and consumers now search for it by name before they ever search for a broker.

New Zealand has no equivalent. "Mortgage pre approval nz" gets 30 searches a month. Pre-approval exists here, it just has no name anyone types.

For a brand launching into a category where — on the evidence of your 2 September call — everyone puts "Book a consultation" in the nav, owning a named step is a category-defining move rather than a campaign. It creates the search demand, gives the ads a concrete thing to offer instead of a conversation, gives Google a term to capture, and gives the assistants something specific to cite.

What UK brokers actually run

UK cost benchmarks

MetricFigureNote
Google Ads CPC, UK mortgage brokers£2.24 (Apr 2026)Down 11.8% on prior period
Meta CPL£15–£50Cheaper leads correlate with worse close rates
Working monthly budget£1,000–£3,000Needs 50+ leads/month for the algorithm to optimise at all
Cost per funded loan — first-party$1,200–$2,000First-party acquisition runs 4–7× cheaper per funded loan than aggregator leads. This is the argument against buying leads, in one line.
Cost per funded loan — aggregator$5,000–$15,000+

The transferable lesson, and the limit of it

The UK proves the mechanics work at scale — lead ads, short forms, speed-to-lead, geo-modifiers, funded-loan optimisation. What does not transfer is the volume assumption. A UK broker can run a pure search strategy because "mortgage advisor" alone is 17,000 searches a month. At 150 in New Zealand, the same playbook starves. Take the mechanics, not the channel mix.

05Compliance guardrails

Cheap to respect, expensive to ignore — and directly relevant if advisers are going to post under the brand.

Implication for the adviser-authority strategy

It works, but it needs a review lane. General information + named regulated adviser + clear disclosure is fine. A personalised recommendation in a TikTok comment is not. An internal content sign-off process is not optional here.

06What I'd recommend

The two-speed structure

Speed 1 — paid, bottom of funnel only. One campaign spanning hot → warm, with the conversion window kept inside 14–30 days so the pixel can actually learn. Optimise to conversations, not survey fills. Do not point paid budget at an education or lead-magnet funnel: the cold-to-mortgage cycle runs 12–18 months, and the campaign gets killed as "not working" long before it could ever prove out.

Speed 2 — owned authority, unpaid. Content, SEO, LLM discoverability, adviser social. Runs continuously, compounds, but never receives media budget.

Their unfair advantage — and it's a big one

They are not a startup broker. They have an existing life insurance and KiwiSaver book. That database is the best mortgage lead source in the country for them, and it costs nothing:

Sequence it that way round

Prove the conversion machine on warm database traffic where CAC is near zero, establish the true cost-per-settled-mortgage, then buy cold traffic with a number you can defend. This also fixes the attribution problem: you get a working pixel and real conversion data inside 30 days instead of 18 months.

Building brand authority through the advisers

The advisers are the trust asset; the brand is the container. In order of ROI:

  1. A Google Business Profile per adviser and per location, with a review engine behind it. The local pack outranks everything organic on the money terms, and review count is the top-of-fold credibility signal on every winning ad in the database — Platinum 314, Naked Finance 289. Reviews are simultaneously the SEO play, the ad-creative play and the AI-citation play. Start day one; it has the longest lead time.
  2. Adviser-to-camera short vertical video, distributed organically then promoted as paid creative. Cheap, on-trend, and the format the algorithms currently reward.
  3. Get onto the listicles that already rank — MoneyHub, Opes Partners, Canstar. Faster than trying to outrank them.
  4. Referral-partner programme to real estate agents, accountants and lawyers, with LinkedIn as the recruiting surface.
  5. Named advisers with real bios and credentials on every page. Trust in this category attaches to humans, not logos — and it is what the assistants cite.

Tracking — non-negotiable given clawback

Server-side plus client-side, multi-touch, with the conversion event on settled loan, not lead. With clawback biting at 24–27 months, lead-level optimisation will happily buy a stream of serial refinancers who pay the commission back.

07Questions to get answered

On the book — this determines everything

  • How many life and KiwiSaver clients, and how many have a mortgage already?
  • Do they capture KiwiSaver first-home withdrawal intent? Can they see it?
  • Is there consent to market mortgage services to the existing book?

On the shape of the business

  • How many advisers — employed, contracted or franchised? Own leads or central pool?
  • Which aggregator or group, and what lead flow comes attached?
  • Target mortgages per month, by when?
  • Average loan size assumption — the whole media model hangs off this.

On brand and constraints

  • Is the mortgage brand separate from the life/KiwiSaver brand, or endorsed by it? Separate means starting from zero on domain, reviews and entity signals — expensive, and worth challenging.
  • Who signs off adviser-generated content, and how fast?
  • Budget, and appetite for a 90-day proving period before scale.

08One thing to clarify in the first five minutes

"A whole heap of trusts"

I have read this as trust and authority to build for the new brand, and written the recommendation that way. If it actually means legal trusts — trust-owned lending, trustee clients, an existing trust book to activate — that is a materially different and more specific commercial opportunity. Trust-structured lending is a genuine niche with far less competition and higher average loan sizes, and it would change the recommendation.