State of play for a life insurance and KiwiSaver firm launching a mortgage brokerage — where advisers actually get leads, what is working digitally right now, and what the numbers will carry.
Advisers now write ~60% of all new NZ home lending — so this is a share fight, not a category fight. The economics are unusually forgiving: 0.85–0.90% upfront on settlement means a $600k loan pays roughly $5,100–$5,400, which tolerates a cost-per-settled-mortgage most verticals could never carry. But bottom-of-funnel search volume in NZ is tiny — "mortgage broker" is 1,800 searches a month nationally, "mortgage adviser" is 150 — so Google is a floor, not a plan. The volume channel is Meta at roughly NZ$55–75 a lead, and the SERP for the money terms is owned by the local pack, the MoneyHub/Opes listicles and Reddit, which a brand-new domain cannot displace. For a firm with an existing life and KiwiSaver book, the cheapest mortgages they will ever write are already sitting in their database — and that should fund the paid experiments, not the other way round.
Two things changed recently that most advertisers in this market have not caught up with.
| Measure | Position |
|---|---|
| OCR | 2.75% — hiked 25bps on 2 September 2026, a back-to-back hike |
| Floating | ANZ 6.29% · ASB 6.29% · BNZ 6.34% · Kiwibank 6.25% · Westpac 6.39% |
| 1-year fixed | ~4.95% (Kiwibank) |
| Direction | Rising. Banks passed the full 25bps to floating — unlike the 2025 cuts, which they under-passed |
Every mortgage ad in the country for the last 18 months has run some version of "rates are falling — refix and save." That hook is now dead or actively wrong. The market has flipped to "lock it in before it moves again" — urgency-led rather than saving-led. Whoever changes creative first gets a clean run while everyone else keeps running stale angles.
| Bank | Broker-originated share of book | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Westpac | 58% | Mar 2026, up from 56.7% Sep 2025 |
| ANZ | 53% | Mar 2026, up from 51% two years earlier |
| BNZ | 40% | Mar 2026, up from 38% Sep 2024 |
| Market — new home loans | ~60% | Big four + Kiwibank take 86% of broker-sourced lending; non-banks 8% |
| Item | Figure |
|---|---|
| Upfront commission | 0.55%–0.85% of loan — ANZ, ASB and TSB all pay 0.85%, no trail |
| Westpac from 1 Jun 2026 | Single 0.90% upfront, trail abolished |
| Trail (where paid) | 0.15%–0.20% p.a. on balance |
| Clawback | Full or partial if discharged inside 24–27 months |
A $600k average loan pays ~$5,100–$5,400 on settlement. That is what justifies paid acquisition here. It also means clawback is a marketing problem, not just an ops problem — a lead source that produces serial refinancers destroys the unit economics twice. Measure to settled and retained past 27 months, never to lead.
Ranked by real volume, honestly.
| Keyword | Searches/mo | CPC (USD) | KD |
|---|---|---|---|
| mortgage calculator nz | 20,000 | $0.20 | 54 |
| mortgage broker | 1,800 | $4.50 | 68 |
| best mortgage rates nz | 900 | $0.70 | 57 |
| kiwisaver first home | 800 | $0.50 | 45 |
| mortgage broker auckland | 700 | $5.00 | 53 |
| home loan nz | 350 | $1.00 | 62 |
| refinance mortgage nz | 150 | $2.50 | 48 |
| mortgage adviser | 150 | $5.00 | 36 |
| mortgage advisor near me | 150 | $4.00 | 34 |
| first home buyer nz | 90 | $0.80 | 55 |
| mortgage pre approval nz | 30 | $3.50 | — |
Ahrefs CPC is a USD estimate (≈NZ$8.50 at $5.00). Real auction CPCs in NZ financial services routinely run well above this — treat as a floor, not a forecast.
Total high-intent commercial volume across every meaningful mortgage term in New Zealand is a few thousand searches a month, nationally. Even at 100% impression share you cannot build a multi-adviser business on search alone. Note the shape too: the only high-volume term is mortgage calculator nz at 20,000/month on a 20c CPC — that is research traffic, not buyers, and it is exactly the trap of paying to fill an education funnel. Google's real job here is to catch demand you created elsewhere, plus a tight non-brand BOF core. It is a capture channel, not a demand channel.
SERP for "mortgage broker auckland":
| Pos | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Local pack — Kiwi Mortgages, Global Finance, My Money | Sits above all organic |
| 2 | People Also Ask block | — |
| 3 | nzhl.co.nz | DR 42 |
| 4 | MoneyHub listicle | DR 65 |
| 5 | Opes Partners "Top 10 Brokers" | DR 58 · 180 backlinks |
| 6 | Reddit ×2 recommendation threads | r/PersonalFinanceNZ |
| 7 | Squirrel | DR 49 · 870 backlinks |
| 8 | Guardian Smith | DR 14 |
| 9 | Loan Market Central | DR 56 |
A brand-new domain ranks nowhere against this inside 12 months. At $500/month you buy spammy backlinks and nothing else; real movement in this vertical starts around $3–4k/month. But two doors are open and cheap: the local pack (a Google Business Profile per adviser and location, driven by review velocity) and placement on the listicles that already rank. Both are distribution plays, not ranking plays.
Benchmarks: financial services median CPL ~US$38 (≈NZ$64), with finance CPLs up 24% year on year.
What is actually live in New Zealand right now. These counts come from the verified niche view — an earlier draft used the raw view, which is known to misclassify ~57% of advertisers and inflates counts through a join fan-out. Verified NZ Lending & Finance is 740 ads across 18 advertisers, not the 4,618/38 the raw view reports:
| Advertiser | Live ads | Longest run | What they're doing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platinum Finance | 121 | 217d | 7-step multi-step form, "Apply in 3 minutes", 5.0★ / 314 Google reviews above the fold, "won't affect your credit score" objection-killer in the subhead, income pre-qualifier on step 1 |
| BetterSaver (KiwiSaver) | 119 | 73d | Quiz funnel, "free — paid by the provider", licensed FAP number shown, Stuff / NZ Herald / RNZ media logos. Running FB + Google + LinkedIn + Microsoft + Reddit + TikTok |
| Naked Finance | 22 | 121d | The closest analogue here — FHB guide + UK pension transfer guide, dual CTA (download and book), 289 Google reviews, mortgages + KiwiSaver + insurance + investments under one adviser brand |
| Better (betterco.nz) | 39 | 79d | FB + Google + Microsoft + TikTok |
| Total Mortgages | 6 | 32d | save.total.nz/refinance, Vercel-hosted, Facebook only |
| Instant Finance, MTF, Harmoney, LoanDirect, Prospa | — | up to 158d | Consumer / business lending, not mortgage — but they set the CPM you compete against |
On verified data, ads surviving 60+ days break down as: 117 ads (10 advertisers) top-of-funnel LEARN_MORE with no offer, averaging 130 days; 83 ads mid-funnel APPLY_NOW, averaging 107 days; 34 ads bottom-funnel APPLY_NOW. Lead-magnet offers total just 15 ads across the whole proven cohort.
Caveat added after seeding: that cohort was consumer lenders and insurers — it contained almost no mortgage brokers. Now that the brokers are in, the picture is more balanced: Squirrel's single longest-running ad (119 days) is a lead-magnet download, and it runs guides for first-home buyers, refixing and investing. So the honest read is not "lead magnets don't work" — it is that consumer lenders run apply-now and advisers run guides-plus-consult. See the messaging section below.
What the winners share: review counts above the fold, a named regulated entity, a credit-score or cost objection killed in the subhead, and a multi-step form with a qualifier on step one. Nobody wins on creative polish.
Mortgage content averages ~3.7% engagement versus ~0.15% on Facebook. Unpolished, phone-shot, single-adviser-to-camera outperforms produced brand video by a wide margin. Skews first home buyer, 20s–30s. Already in use by NZ finance advertisers — BetterSaver, Better, Instant Finance and Platinum all show TikTok pixels.
This is where "use the advisers to build the brand" converts directly into media, because the asset the algorithm rewards is exactly the asset a stable of advisers can produce for free.
The OpenAI pilot went live in New Zealand on 17 April 2026, and as of 3 September 2026 NZ is listed for self-service access through OpenAI Ads Manager (beta). Ads serve to Free and Go plan users only — Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu accounts do not see them. Buying is CPC or CPM, with reporting on impressions, clicks, spend, CTR, average CPC/CPM and conversions.
Targeting is conversational context and intent, not exact-match keywords. That matters for this category: the mortgage journey is a long series of questions people are already asking an assistant — "how much deposit do I actually need", "should I fix for one year or two", "can I use KiwiSaver for a first home" — and this is the first channel that lets you buy against that conversation directly.
It is a beta with almost no NZ financial-services competition in it. That is the cheap-attention window, and windows like this close. It does not replace Meta as the volume channel — but a contained test alongside the AI-visibility work (being the brand the assistants cite organically) is a genuinely differentiated position for a brand launching into a category where everyone else is still buying "book a consultation" clicks.
Not a consumer channel here. Its job is referral-partner acquisition — real estate agents, accountants, lawyers — and adviser recruitment. Naked Finance runs it; BetterSaver runs it.
An earlier version of this brief said the category was thin on Meta. That was an artefact of the watchlist, not the market. I've now added 25 NZ mortgage advertisers to the scraper and re-run it.
The ad database is a curated watchlist, not a mirror of the Ad Library — it simply had almost no mortgage brokers in it. Having seeded and scraped them, the tracked set is now 27 mortgage advertisers, 597 ads, 326 of them live. The category is not thin. Some of it has been running continuously for close to six years.
| Advertiser | Ads | Live | Longest run | Since | Ad Library |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NZHL | 251 | 27 | 1,997d | Mar 2021 | View → |
| Squirrel | 69 | 29 | 2,112d | Nov 2020 | View → |
| Lighthouse Financial | 67 | 63 | 1,966d | Apr 2021 | View → |
| Journey Mortgages | 33 | 33 | 62d | Jul 2026 | View → |
| Naked Finance | 23 | 22 | 121d | Apr 2026 | View → |
| Rayen & Wood Financial | 19 | 19 | 98d | Jun 2026 | View → |
| Mike Pero Mortgages | 18 | 18 | 22d | 17 Aug 2026 | View → |
| Key & Compass | 18 | 18 | 119d | May 2026 | View → |
| Buddy Mortgages & Insurance | 17 | 16 | 1,253d | Apr 2023 | View → |
| Finance Lab NZ | 14 | 14 | 57d | Jul 2026 | View → |
| Southern Mortgages NZ | 12 | 12 | 28d | Aug 2026 | View → |
| Total Mortgages | 6 | 6 | 32d | May 2026 | View → |
Plus a long tail of individual advisers running 1–5 ads each: Simpler Mortgages, Mortgage Easy, Matt Willoughby, Brenda Nom, Paolo Valerio, Courtney Harrison (Aim Financial), Stuart Harris (The Finance Collective).
Mike Pero launched a coordinated franchise-wide campaign on 17 August 2026 — all 18 brand-level ads started that exact day, and so did the individual adviser pages: Dan Parry, Rose & Tim Ross (Tauranga), David Clemens. Craig Chirnside (Dunedin) followed on 5 September.
NZHL runs the same shape: a corporate page advertising since March 2021, plus branch pages (Cambridge, Papamoa) running their own ads.
This is exactly the model being proposed for today — a brand plus a stable of advisers each carrying their own presence — and there is a live NZ implementation three weeks old to copy or beat. Individual adviser pages: Dan Parry · David Clemens · Rose & Tim Ross · NZHL Cambridge
Still the best-run funnel for their existing business — same customer, same regulatory frame, same "free advice" model. All four lead with a cost of inaction, not a product:
| Hook | Format | Why it's interesting | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Don't let the wrong fund cost you $120,000" | Video | A single specific number doing all the work. No offer, no lead magnet. | Open → |
| "Most Kiwis are in the wrong KiwiSaver" | Video | Category-level accusation, then a stat | Open → |
| "Stop Googling. Start knowing." | Image | Names the behaviour the prospect is doing right now | Open → |
| "Later has a cost" | Carousel | Procrastination as the enemy | Open → |
Ad Library links open Meta's public archive. Ads rotate, so a link may 404 if that creative has been retired.
Read directly from the live ad copy of the five most significant advertisers. The single most useful observation is what nobody does.
Across every live ad from NZHL, Squirrel, Lighthouse, Journey and Mike Pero, no advertiser competes on "best rates". They sell time, freedom, found money, and expertise. In a market where the product is functionally identical between brokers, the whole category has already worked out that rate is not the wedge — and a new brand arriving with "we'll find you the best rate" would be the only one saying it, for the wrong reason.
The strongest positioning in the market, and the most disciplined. Sells the outcome, never the transaction.
Every NZHL ad says talk to a Mortgage Mentor. This is the same move as the UK's "mortgage in principle" in section 04: take the undifferentiated thing everyone sells, give it a name you own, and make the category compete on your vocabulary. It is the cheapest competitive moat in the brief.
63 live ads. An accounting + insurance + KiwiSaver firm running the exact multi-service cross-sell motion the prospect is proposing.
Launched July 2026 from nothing to 33 live ads. The closest thing to a live rehearsal of this launch.
All 18 ads carry the identical headline "Get in the Know Today". The body is the only thing that changes, and it changes by audience:
| Segment | Body copy |
|---|---|
| First home buyer | "First Home Buyer? Let's Get You Started!" |
| Refixer | "Time to Refix? We Know the Ropes ⏳" |
| Investor | "Investor-Friendly Mortgage Advice 📊" |
| Self-employed | "Flexible Mortgages for Self-Made Success 💼" |
| Local / trust | "Local Experts, Personalised Service 🤝" |
| Authority | "Your Mortgage, Our Legacy 🤝 Helping Kiwis into Homes for Over 35 Years" |
This is a segment matrix — one creative concept, N audience variants — and it is the most directly copyable structure here for a brand launching with a stable of advisers and five ICPs.
Worth noting as a QA lesson rather than a strategy: two Mike Pero ads run simultaneously claiming "Over 30 Years" and "Over 35 Years". Under FMA fair-dealing, substantiated claims need to be consistent across a live set.
| Advertiser | Primary emotion | Proof device | Offer |
|---|---|---|---|
| NZHL | Aspiration + humour — freedom, time | Substantiated maths footnote | Free chat with a Mortgage Mentor |
| Squirrel | Reassurance + found money | Cashback figures | Downloadable guide, then book |
| Lighthouse | Loss aversion — what you're missing | Named client outcomes | Guide + review consult |
| Journey | Curiosity — "most people don't realise" | Named client stories | Free calculator |
| Mike Pero | Recognition + authority | 35 years / local experts | Segment-matched consult |
The rule-based psychology tagger (hook type, psych triggers, offer type) is still processing the full table and was not finished at the time of writing. The LLM copy, vision and landing-page analysis has not been run on the 25 newly seeded advertisers — so there are no machine-scored copy_angle, copy_awareness, visual_style or landing-page teardown fields for them yet. Everything above is read directly from the live ad copy, not machine-scored. The deeper pass is a ~20-minute job whenever it's wanted.
Designed against the Andromeda Field Manual already in the brain (20 sections, synthesised from 8 Charley T and 2 Alex Becker transcripts). Section references below are to that manual.
No budget has been stated for this business. The figure that actually governs the structure is not what someone wants to spend — it is Meta's learning threshold: ~50 optimisation events per ad set per 7 days. Everything below is derived from that.
At a financial-services CPL of roughly NZ$64, 50 leads a week costs ~NZ$3,200/week ≈ NZ$460/day ≈ NZ$14k/month. That is the minimum for one ad set to reliably exit learning on a lead event. Below it, the structure is unstable no matter how it is drawn.
| What you're funding | Daily | Monthly | What it buys |
|---|---|---|---|
| One campaign, one ad set — learning-safe | ~NZ$460 | ~NZ$14k | ~215 leads/mo. The minimum that works. |
| One campaign + a test ad set | ~NZ$700 | ~NZ$21k | Adds the 322 test loop — the thing that compounds creative quality |
| Two campaigns (refix + FHB), each learning-safe | ~NZ$950 | ~NZ$29k | Both audiences funded properly, own page each |
| Terminal structure — control + 2 tests per profile | $1,400+ | $42k+ | Charley's ceiling. Never grows past this structurally. |
Modelled on the refix campaign at ~NZ$14–15k/month:
| Step | Figure | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leads | ~235/mo | NZ$15k ÷ NZ$64 CPL |
| Qualified | ~150 | ~35% self-disqualify at the form |
| Real conversations | ~90 | ~60% show rate — refix buyers are already qualified, unlike cold FHB |
| Settlements | ~11/mo | ~12% of conversations |
| Commission | ~$57k/mo | 11 × ~$5,200 (0.85–0.90% on a $600k loan) |
| Cost per settled loan | ~$1,360 | $15k ÷ 11 |
~$1,360 per settled loan lands inside the UK first-party band of $1,200–$2,000 from section 04 — a market with 13× the population and years more maturity. The model was built from NZ CPLs and NZ commission, and it independently arrives where the mature market actually sits. That is the strongest reason to believe the shape is right.
It is also 4–7× cheaper than the $5,000–$15,000 aggregator band — which is the case against buying leads, in one number.
1. CPL. NZ$64 is a global financial-services median. New Zealand is a thinner auction with a smaller supply pool — real NZ CPL could land meaningfully higher. Everything above scales off this one number.
2. Lead → settlement rate. The 12% is modelled on refix buyers being warmer than the cold-funnel assumptions used on the 2 September call. Plausible, unproven.
Neither is knowable before launch. That is the entire argument for phasing rather than launching everything at once.
| Layer | Build | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign | One, CBO | All spend feeds one learning system (§5, Structure A) |
| Ad sets | 1 control. Add 1 test only once the control reliably exits learning | Budget ladder rung 1→2. Hard ceiling is 3 ad sets even at $1M/mo |
| Control ads | The 5 Olympic Rings below | 4–8 ads, mixed image and video |
| Test ad | One 322: 3 creatives, 2 headlines, 2 primary texts | 12 combinations, one shared learning pool (§6). Never load 5–10 creatives |
| Retargeting | Broad, inside the control — rings 4 and 5 | Not pixel-event. Chasing form-abandoners chases people who already said no |
| Landing page | One, with continuity from the primary text | A second page is only earned when a hook proves it deserves its own system |
Ring 4 is the second touch for anyone who saw 1 or 2. Ring 5 is the second touch for 2 or 3. The overlap is the point — same message, rebuilt for someone who has already seen it.
| Ring | Job | Hook direction for NZ mortgage |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Problem cold | Name a gap they have not quantified. No product, no offer. | "The refix email is not an offer. It's a default." Your fixed term ends, the bank emails you one number, you click accept. That is not a decision — and it is how most of the country refixes. Nobody ever looks at the structure underneath. |
| 2 · Mechanism cold | Your named, new process. This is where the "name the step" play from §04 lands. | "Rate is one line in a loan. Structure is the other nine." Name the process and own it — the way NZHL owns "Mortgage Mentor" and the UK owns "mortgage in principle". Split banding, offset, term length, and a refix calendar — then taken to every lender, not just yours. |
| 3 · Trigger cold | The life event that makes it urgent right now. Identity-specific. | Three live NZ triggers, one ad each if budget allows: "Your 2023 fix is about to land in a 2026 market." (the refix wave) "The deposit rule changed in December. Your bank didn't call you." (LVR: 25% of owner-occupier lending can now go above 80%) "Rates went up twice. The next move isn't yours to wait for." (OCR 2.75%, back-to-back hikes) |
| 4 · Proof warm — 2nd touch for 1+2 | A named client outcome. Answers "does this work for someone like me?" | "Same rate. Different structure. Nine years off the loan." Named couple, suburb, what was actually changed, what it did. This is precisely what Journey ("Ben had received an inheritance…") and Lighthouse ("we helped Rachel & Dion…") already run — it is the proven proof device in this market. |
| 5 · Objections warm — 2nd touch for 2+3 | Dismantle what they are doing instead. | "Your bank made you an offer. That isn't the same as advice." Three objections to handle: the bank's retention offer (they are paid to keep you, not restructure you); the existing adviser (when did they last review the structure, not the rate?); and "I'll do it later" — which NZHL already attacks with "don't wait until your wrinkles have wrinkles". |
Same object from the other direction — a sales script distributed across six ads (§8). Slots 1–3 are rings 1–3; slots 4–6 are rings 4–5.
| Slot | Format | NZ mortgage build |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | UGC video — adviser to camera | The refix-default problem. Run 3 hooks here to find which agitates most. This is where the adviser stable becomes the media asset. |
| 2 | Static — winning hook | Once slot 1 names the winner, rebuild it as a static and build the rest of the funnel around it |
| 3 | Same problem, second benefit | Lean on time (years off the loan) rather than rate — the whole category already avoids rate |
| 4 | The offer, straight up | The named structure review. Free, no obligation, and say what happens in it |
| 5 | Client result | Named testimonial plus the actual mechanics of what was done |
| 6 | Objection handler | Big-text static. The bank's offer, the current adviser, "later" |
§15 of the manual: optimise for the outcome, not the event. In this vertical that is unusually hard and unusually important:
The field manual is explicit that these are gaps, so treat the application here as reasoning rather than doctrine:
Also worth knowing: nothing in the manual is independently verified (§19). Both men are selling — Charley promotes Disruptor Academy, Becker is CEO of Hyros. "Both agree" means strong consensus, not corroboration.
With budget available, the §5 splitting rule now scores 3 of 3: different problem ✓, different landing page ✓, enough budget for each to exit learning ✓. So yes — separate campaigns, Becker structure, one dedicated page each.
But the deciding factor is not the audience. It is the conversion window:
| Refix / refinance | First home buyer | |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle | 14–30 days | 3–18 months |
| Already qualified? | Yes — the loan exists | No — the deposit may not exist |
| Pixel behaviour | Learns fast, closes the loop | Never closes inside the attribution window |
| Optimisation event | Lead → settled | Must use an intermediate event (pre-approval submitted) |
| Watch for | Clawback at 24–27 months — refinancers are the exposed segment | Judging it on the refix clock and killing it at day 60 |
Run them together in one ad set and Meta optimises toward whichever converts faster — refix — and starves FHB. Worse, optimising to "lead" lets the FHB half flood the funnel with leads that never settle, teaching the algorithm the wrong lead shape. They need separate campaigns, separate events, and separate clocks.
Even with unlimited budget, buying cold first-home-buyer traffic is the second-best way for this business to get first home buyers. KiwiSaver first-home withdrawal is a mortgage-intent signal they already hold — someone drawing down is buying inside about 90 days, and no competitor can see it. Paying Meta for cold FHB while sitting on a KiwiSaver book is buying something you already own.
So: buy refix, harvest FHB — and let paid FHB be the top-up once the owned channel is exhausted, not the first move.
The UK runs the same product to the same kind of buyer, but the market is roughly 13× the population and vastly more developed. The gaps are where the ideas are.
| Term | UK vol/mo | UK CPC | Nearest NZ term | NZ vol/mo | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mortgage in principle | 20,000 | $10.00 | mortgage pre approval nz | 30 | 667× |
| mortgage advisor | 17,000 | $6.00 | mortgage adviser | 150 | 113× |
| remortgage | 14,000 | $5.00 | refinance mortgage nz | 150 | 93× |
| first time buyer mortgage | 6,900 | $1.00 | first home buyer nz | 90 | 77× |
| mortgage broker | 13,000 | $6.00 | mortgage broker | 1,800 | 7× |
| mortgage calculator | 380,000 | $0.70 | mortgage calculator nz | 20,000 | 19× |
| buy to let mortgage | 29,000 | $0.80 | — | — | — |
| how much can i borrow mortgage | 15,000 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| bad credit mortgage | 1,900 | $5.00 | — | — | — |
CPC is Ahrefs' USD estimate. Population multiple UK:NZ is roughly 13×, which makes the outliers above the real story.
"Mortgage in principle" is a 20,000-a-month search term in the UK carrying the highest CPC in the entire set ($10.00). It is not a product. It is a named, searchable, mid-funnel step that the UK industry productised, and consumers now search for it by name before they ever search for a broker.
New Zealand has no equivalent. "Mortgage pre approval nz" gets 30 searches a month. Pre-approval exists here, it just has no name anyone types.
For a brand launching into a category where — on the evidence of your 2 September call — everyone puts "Book a consultation" in the nav, owning a named step is a category-defining move rather than a campaign. It creates the search demand, gives the ads a concrete thing to offer instead of a conversation, gives Google a term to capture, and gives the assistants something specific to cite.
| Metric | Figure | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Google Ads CPC, UK mortgage brokers | £2.24 (Apr 2026) | Down 11.8% on prior period |
| Meta CPL | £15–£50 | Cheaper leads correlate with worse close rates |
| Working monthly budget | £1,000–£3,000 | Needs 50+ leads/month for the algorithm to optimise at all |
| Cost per funded loan — first-party | $1,200–$2,000 | First-party acquisition runs 4–7× cheaper per funded loan than aggregator leads. This is the argument against buying leads, in one line. |
| Cost per funded loan — aggregator | $5,000–$15,000+ |
The UK proves the mechanics work at scale — lead ads, short forms, speed-to-lead, geo-modifiers, funded-loan optimisation. What does not transfer is the volume assumption. A UK broker can run a pure search strategy because "mortgage advisor" alone is 17,000 searches a month. At 150 in New Zealand, the same playbook starves. Take the mechanics, not the channel mix.
Cheap to respect, expensive to ignore — and directly relevant if advisers are going to post under the brand.
It works, but it needs a review lane. General information + named regulated adviser + clear disclosure is fine. A personalised recommendation in a TikTok comment is not. An internal content sign-off process is not optional here.
Speed 1 — paid, bottom of funnel only. One campaign spanning hot → warm, with the conversion window kept inside 14–30 days so the pixel can actually learn. Optimise to conversations, not survey fills. Do not point paid budget at an education or lead-magnet funnel: the cold-to-mortgage cycle runs 12–18 months, and the campaign gets killed as "not working" long before it could ever prove out.
Speed 2 — owned authority, unpaid. Content, SEO, LLM discoverability, adviser social. Runs continuously, compounds, but never receives media budget.
They are not a startup broker. They have an existing life insurance and KiwiSaver book. That database is the best mortgage lead source in the country for them, and it costs nothing:
Prove the conversion machine on warm database traffic where CAC is near zero, establish the true cost-per-settled-mortgage, then buy cold traffic with a number you can defend. This also fixes the attribution problem: you get a working pixel and real conversion data inside 30 days instead of 18 months.
The advisers are the trust asset; the brand is the container. In order of ROI:
Server-side plus client-side, multi-touch, with the conversion event on settled loan, not lead. With clawback biting at 24–27 months, lead-level optimisation will happily buy a stream of serial refinancers who pay the commission back.
I have read this as trust and authority to build for the new brand, and written the recommendation that way. If it actually means legal trusts — trust-owned lending, trustee clients, an existing trust book to activate — that is a materially different and more specific commercial opportunity. Trust-structured lending is a genuine niche with far less competition and higher average loan sizes, and it would change the recommendation.